It's perfectly reasonable to apply those "Realism" principles back then, but 50 years later, to pawn the same at the public in today's context is either morally blind, or just insane. It's like the department of flat earth not changing course offerings. Sound analysis. Lots of traffic, kicking up lots of dust, but we'll be able to see what really happens shortly.
It's perfectly reasonable to apply those "Realism" principles back then, but 50 years later, to pawn the same at the public in today's context is either morally blind, or just insane. It's like the department of flat earth not changing course offerings. Sound analysis. Lots of traffic, kicking up lots of dust, but we'll be able to see what really happens shortly.
examples of the realists commentary (who might not realize what they truly believe in):
- https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/08/02/nancy-pelosis-trip-to-taiwan-highlights-americas-incoherent-strategy
- https://www.ft.com/content/1221fae6-c5d0-4cc0-8e6b-227a041098d9
- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/01/nancy-pelosis-visit-to-taiwan-risks-upsetting-beijing-to-no-advantage